If you’ve ever wondered if macro-tracking is all it’s cracked up to be [good, bad or ugly]… keep reading.

In this blog I talk about what it is, what it isn’t (or shouldn’t be anyway), why it may or may not work for you, and what all the blatant contradiction with it is all about – and believe me, there are lots of contradicting opinions on it in the nutrition world.

Some nutrition coaches insist that “Tracking your food is obsessive and toxic!” and that no one should ever do it. Period.

Others may state it’s the only way to really dial in your nutrition.

And while I get where the concern and passion comes from on both sides, here’s the thing:

The truth is a little more nuanced — and a lot more individual.

Let’s set the record straight.

Tracking Isn’t the Enemy. Poor Fit Is.

Macro or food tracking isn’t inherently bad, obsessive, or dangerous. For many people, it’s actually incredibly helpful. Temporarily tracking can improve diet quality, boost awareness, and support long-term results. It’s backed by a tremendous amount of evidence and used around the world by nutrition professionals, athletes, and everyday folks who just want to feel better in their skin.

Saying that no one should ever track is just as rigid as saying everyone should. And neither is helpful.

Because here’s the real truth:

Nutrition isn’t one-size-fits-all.

It’s not black and white. It’s highly individual. What works for you depends on your goals, your mindset, your current habits, your lifestyle, and your history with food.

A Tool — Not a Life Sentence

Tracking is a tool — not a lifestyle, not a moral judgment, not a forever thing.

It’s just one strategy among many.
If it helps you gain clarity on what you’re eating, spot patterns, understand how much protein you’re actually getting, or learn what foods keep you full — great!
If it starts to feel stressful, obsessive, or controlling — time to pivot.

The key? Using it on purpose and with purpose — not as punishment, but as part of a bigger-picture strategy.

Not For Everyone — But Often Misunderstood

Are there people who shouldn’t track?
Of course.
Those with a history of disordered eating or who find numbers triggering might be better served with a different approach — and I support that 100%.

But the number of people for whom temporary, guided tracking is actively harmful? It’s very small. And it’s not fair (or accurate) to generalize that risk across the entire population.

What’s more helpful than labeling tracking as “bad”? Teaching people how to use it well, and when to use something else instead.

What I Do With My Clients

When I work with someone, we explore what approach will serve them best.
Some clients thrive with short-term tracking to build awareness, set a baseline, and create structure. Others prefer to work on behavior-based goals like choosing more real foods over fast foods, developing hunger awareness, or practicing meal prep routines — no app required.

Either way, my job is to guide you in discovering what works best for YOU, not to push a one-size-fits-none philosophy.

---

In summary:

Tracking isn’t toxic. And intuitive eating isn’t a magic fix.
They’re both strategies with pros and cons, and they both have a place — depending on the person.

So let’s stop the fear-mongering and start supporting people where they’re at.

Nutrition should feel empowering — not shame-filled.
And you deserve support that gives you options, not ultimatums.

---

Want help figuring out what method will work best for YOU?

Let’s chat! I offer 1:1 coaching sessions (at half-price for RxGRIT members!) where we can look at your habits, goals, and challenges — and create a nutrition strategy that fits.

✨ [Click here to book a session or learn more about the membership >>] ✨